The quasars were deemed to be strange new phenomena, and initially there was considerable speculation that new laws of physics might have to be invented to account for the amount of energy that they produced. However, subsequent research has shown that the quasars are closely related to the active galaxies that have been studied at closer distances. We now believe quasars and active galaxies to be related phenomena, and that their energy output can be explained using the theory of general relativity. In that sense, the quasars are certainly strange, but perhaps are not completely new phenomena.”
What we have here is M87 which is a dominant Galaxy in the Virgo Galaxy cluster, of which we are a part of.
Looking at this from an unconventional view, that red shift is intrinsic and not a product of velocity. It is possible to see that (0.004360) is low compared to its neighbours linked with plasma. M49 (0.003326 ) which is possible to see in the pictures above has a lower redshift than M87 and is believed to be the oldest. Quasar NGC4639 ,which can also be seen in picture above has a redshift of 1018. Which falls in with ejection theory this Quasar being a lot younger than M87 and M49.
M49, with a low redshift, would be the “mother” of the Virgo Cluster. M87, with a slightly higher redshift, would be an early ejection. The compact cluster between M49 and M87 and the quasar 3C273 on the opposite side of M49, both with nearly the same much higher redshift, are likely an ejection pair. As M49 rotated, later ejections spewed out x-ray-emitting material that formed the spiral shape, just as a spinning garden hose throws out a spiral of water.
Ok I am a skeptic already, how do they know they are gravitational waves ?
It seems like anything in the scientific world that has remotely to do with the theory of relativity, anything at all that can be tied in an obscure way. Any chance of it supposedly verifying relativity, once discovered is trumpeted immediately around the world. All through the media, television, radio, you tube, newspapers.
So what is it we know about the instruments used to make this break through ?
Interferometry is an important investigative technique in the fields of astronomy, fiber optics, engineering metrology, optical metrology, oceanography, seismology, spectroscopy (and its applications to chemistry), quantum mechanics, nuclear and particle physics, plasma physics, remote sensing, biomolecular …
“Interferometry makes use of the principle of superposition to combine waves in a way that will cause the result of their combination to have some meaningful property that is diagnostic of the original state of the waves”
Four different examples of interferometer..
Figure 1. The light path through a Michelson interferometer. The two light rays with a common source combine at the half-silvered mirror to reach the detector. They may either interfere constructively (strengthening in intensity) if their light waves arrive in phase, or interfere destructively (weakening in intensity) if they arrive out of phase, depending on the exact distances between the three mirrors.
Interferometry is a family of techniques in which waves, usually electromagnetic, are superimposed in order to extract information about the waves.
Great so what I can guess about this instrument, it is a laser version of the Michelson interferometer. Where mirrors are used to bounce the beam around and any change of the beam is picked up by the detector.
The Ligo detector has been going since 2002, it has been overhauled. Nothing has been found until yesterday. So there is interference in the laser beam, is it a gravity wave, could it be something else?
I await a rational answer on this, will keep you posted.
Current models of how stars evolve lack magnetic fields as a fundamental ingredient.
An international group of astronomers led by the University of Sydney has discovered strong magnetic fields are common in stars, not rare as previously thought, which will dramatically impact our understanding of how stars evolve.
Using data from NASA’s Kepler mission, the team found that stars only slightly more massive than the Sun have internal magnetic fields up to 10 million times that of the Earth,
Because only 5-10 percent of stars were previously thought to host strong magnetic fields, current models of how stars evolve lack magnetic fields as a fundamental ingredient,” Associate Professor Stello said. “Such fields have simply been regarded insignificant for our general understanding of stellar evolution.
There is a lot of talk about gravity in science. There is so much speculation when it comes to the Universe and gravitational forces. We have fat cat scientists telling us about black holes, dark matter, dark energy and billions spent on verification of this Quackery !
Ok ok I here you say, just what am I eluding to ?
Gravity rules the entire universe, in the middle of our galaxy there is a black hole, which nothing can escape not even light. Sagatarius A, if you google it without any real proof (there is a lot of speculation however which manages to convince a lot of people), it will say there is a black hole in there.
Where is Electricity and magnetism, well Electricity doesn’t belong in the official scientific workings of the Universe, magnetism does play a slight role. It is as if Relativity has hijacked mainstream science’s minds (and billions).
Why is it when any interesting observations relating to the workings of the universe are pretty much ignored, such as plasma or electrical effects.
So to demonstrate the difference between gravity and electricity I will show you an interesting experiment.
Galileo Galilei had dropped two balls of different masses from the Leaning Tower of Pisa to demonstrate that their time of descent was independent of their mass. So gravity has been established in science as independent of Mass. Is there anything that defies this rule ? Well apart from air resistance which may slow descent, there is one experiment that shows the interaction between electricity and gravity. Electrical effects can in fact diminish gravitational effects. In this experiment is explained in the way of Lenz’s Law, these are the key words in the explanation. “The induced current in the copper tube creates its own magnetic field that opposes the magnetic field that created it.”
Rather than follow relativity blindly with the assumption of curved space time, T T Brown instead followed Tesla’s work. Which included Euclidian geometry instead.
His work with electrogravitics intertwined both electrostatics and gravity. He built devices that could fly using electricity, they were small and his work was not published. He did however obtain patents as follows
This invention relates to a method of controlling gravitation and for deriving power therefrom, and to a method of producing linear force or motion. The method is fundamentally electrical.
The invention also relates to machines or apparatus requiring electrical energy that control or influence the gravitational field or the energy of gravitation; also to machines or apparatus requiring electrical energy that exhibit a linear force or motion which is believed to be independent of all frames of reference save that which is at rest relative to the universe taken as a whole, and said linear force or motion is furthermore believed to have no equal and opposite reaction that can be observed by any method.
Fields in space are produced by the presence of material bodies or electric charges. They are gravitational fields or electric fields according to their causes.