Do you believe Relativity holds the secrets of the Universe ?

The Greatest scientist of the 20th Century had this to say about Relativity

Nikola Tesla “a beggar, wrapped in purple, whom ignorant people took for a king.”

He gave us electrical energy to our homes,wireless..

So why does Relativity hold the spot light ..?

Advertisements

The problem with modern Astronomy

Is this..

“Quasars Are Related to Active Galaxies

The quasars were deemed to be strange new phenomena, and initially there was considerable speculation that new laws of physics might have to be invented to account for the amount of energy that they produced. However, subsequent research has shown that the quasars are closely related to the active galaxies that have been studied at closer distances. We now believe quasars and active galaxies to be related phenomena, and that their energy output can be explained using the theory of general relativity. In that sense, the quasars are certainly strange, but perhaps are not completely new phenomena.”

From

http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/active/quasars.html

To be more concise “We now believe quasars and active galaxies to be related phenomena, and that their energy output can be explained using the theory of general relativity”

General relativity..

 

 

 

 

This goes on to the Red shift debacle and the Doppler effect

The quasars have very large redshifts, indicating by the Hubble law that they are at great distances.

 

 

So they are related to active galaxies but at great distances according to relativistic Red shift

Please read Halton Arps “Seeing Red”

to understand that Red shift is more likely to be intrinsic when it comes to quasars.

Modern Astronomy tries to tell us there is a black holde in the middle of Quasars.

It is acually more like a white hole which creates rather than destroys..

The Nail in the coffin of the Big Bang Theory..

m87

quasarx
Parent galaxy, with quasar filament attachment.

What we have here is M87 which is a dominant Galaxy in the Virgo Galaxy cluster, of which we are a part of.

Looking at this from an unconventional view, that red shift is intrinsic and not a product of velocity. It is possible to see that (0.004360) is low compared to its neighbours linked with plasma. M49 (0.003326 ) which is possible to see in the pictures above has a lower redshift than M87 and is believed to be the oldest. Quasar NGC4639 ,which can also be seen in picture above has a redshift of 1018. Which falls in with ejection theory this Quasar being a lot younger than M87 and M49.

M49, with a low redshift, would be the “mother” of the Virgo Cluster. M87, with a slightly higher redshift, would be an early ejection. The compact cluster between M49 and M87 and the quasar 3C273 on the opposite side of M49, both with nearly the same much higher redshift, are likely an ejection pair. As M49 rotated, later ejections spewed out x-ray-emitting material that formed the spiral shape, just as a spinning garden hose throws out a spiral of water.